Rich man and lazarus song10/7/2023 ![]() Now, in that same article, the author said other things to support his position. But if conscious torment in a conscious afterlife is false, then would it be wrong for Jesus to imply that it is real? Why would Jesus use a lie (consciousness after death, along with punishment) to illustrate a truth about treating people properly if there is no consciousness after death? It makes no sense. The conditionalist would have to say that the account of the conscious bliss and conscious torment of Lazarus and the rich man in the afterlife is not true. After all, Jesus speaks of people in the afterlife! While it is certainly true that we can glean from Christ’s words the necessity of dealing properly with the poor, to say that it denies any details in the afterlife is, in my opinion, ludicrous. “The p oint of the parable is focused on the Pharisees, who have “disregarded the will of God so clearly expressed in the Scriptures, by neglecting the poor” in their midst.” 6 ibid., underline added.Furthermore, the parable points to the “finality of death, and the futility of thinking that someone coming back from the dead could lead to the repentance of the living.” 5 ibid., underline added “The parable essentially denies “itself of any claim to offer an apocalyptic glimpse” into details of the afterlife and its geography.Instead, it is “to show how to love the poor and needy in our midst.” So, what we gather from the quotes is that story, which they insist is a parable (I don’t believe it is a parable), is not about judgment and punishment. Furthermore, when considered against the background of extra-biblical parallels, it is revealed that the other purpose of the parable is not to provide the reader an eschatological revelation of Hades, but rather, to point the reader to the sufficiency of the Scriptures to show how to love the poor and needy in our midst.“ 4 ibid., underline added “In examining the Lukan context to Jesus’ parable and its cultural and sociological implications, the purpose of the parable clearly serves as a harsh polemic against the Pharisees for their hypocritical attitudes of their wealth and blatant ignorance of the poor in their midst.In this parable of Dives and Lazarus, “two major narrative motives can be paralleled to other ancient literature: (1) reversal of fortunes experienced by a rich man and a poor man after death (2) a dead person’s return from the dead with a message from the living.” 3 “Imperative to understanding the function of this parable is to recognize the close parallels to folktales of the afterlife that were widely popular in Jesus’ time.They must explain it in such a way as to agree with their assumptions. Since most conditionalists affirm soul sleep and since they all deny eternal conscious torment, then this section of Scripture cannot be interpreted to support either one. Cascade Books, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers. The Fire That Consumes: A Biblical and Historical Study of the Doctrine of Final Punishment, Third Edition (p. ![]() Death cannot strike the body or any other part of the soul without striking the entirety of the soul.” 2 Fudge, Edward William. “ When death occurs, then it is the soul that is deprived of life.Cascade Books, an Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers. soul sleep,” the view that death is a state of total unconsciousness, rather than survival in heaven, hell, or purgatory.” 1 Rethinking Hell: Readings in Evangelical Conditionalism (Kindle Locations 503-504).What exactly is it? See the article, Soul sleep problems and questions. But soul sleep is a poorly defined doctrine among annihilationists. Jesus ‘ message is problematic to most annihilationists because the vast majority of them hold to the doctrine of soul sleep. The rich man was in torment in flame, and Lazarus, the poor man, was comforted. In it, both died, and both were alive after their deaths. It is the account of Lazarus and the Rich Man. Luke 16:19-31 (the full text is at the end of this article) is often used to support the idea of conscious torment after death.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |